top of page
Search

Ed Mulhouse and the research on HHJ N. Parfitt's failure to recuse

Writer's picture: shanpanigrahi3000shanpanigrahi3000

Yahoo/Inbox


Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>

To:shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com,centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk,shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com,tiwana9rf@btinternet.com,civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk

Thu, 18 Nov at 19:15


Dear Shan,


Re: E35YM660


Why have you not acted on this-

?


HHJ Parfitt's prior involvement, however limited or tenuous, with Forz Khan in his capacity of litigant (not counsel), your lawyer at the time Nick heard E35YM660, as documented in is adequate to require him, in accordance with the Civils Procedure Rules (CPR) to recuse himself from your case. If in error or ignorance of the facts he did not do so, his ruling itself is voidable upon application.


Parfitt seems to like giving unentitled women 30 grand diamonds. An astoundingly unjust judgment from 2018. He isn't very bright, as dim as

Lightman, and will reverse his decision on suitable application of judicial

conduct pressure. I eat judges like him alive every other week.


Keep the N244 succinct. Do not bring in vishishta advaita or other irrelevant

nonsense. For once, win. Be fast. You'll be out of time in about six weeks.


Further -- stop threatening to behead HMQ and wasting police time and

insulting Muslims and harassing women. It isn't funny.


Who is the person answering 07825521586?


~~~Cherie

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Kommentare


Post: Blog2_Post

07967789619

©2020 by The Conservative Libertarian Society. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page