(no subject)
Inbox
Shantanu Panigrahi
Attachments2 Dec 2021, 15:45 (19 hours ago)
To Administrative Court Administrative Court Office The Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk li
Administrative Court Office, General Office
09:58 (52 minutes ago)
Dear Dr Panigrahi Would you like to lodge a judicial review? You can only do this in the court where the defendant is a public body or governing body. Who is th
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: "Administrative Court Office, General Office" <generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
date: 3 Dec 2021, 10:46
subject: Re:
mailed-by: gmail.com
Dear Mr O’Meara
I would dearly like to lodge a judicial review for there is uncertainty on who precisely is the governing body over the Defendant the Right Honourable the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom under review in Claim E35YM660 of the County Court of Central London. It seems clear fo me from a past correspondence of several years ago that the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council would be the appropriate governing body, because it went beyond the Supreme Court in writing to me (I will have to look through my old shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk email accounts to ensure there this is a true recollection or something that I have surmised over some years). It may go beyond that to the Privy Council itself as the body that discharges duties on judicial as well as Parliamentary processes and procedures so that the Right Honourable Jacob Rees Mogg should be consulted to offer his opinion on whether our Constitution is certain in respect of the Monarchial powers to perform Her duties to the State on the advice of her Ministers, whether it is the Prime Minister under Royal Prerogative powers, the Leader of the House of Commons, or whether Her Majesty the Queen on exceptional circumstances where the legal processes have revealed a conundrum would take it upon herself to overrule the advice that she receives.
There is urgency in this case because a person cannot be held Stateless unable to travel abroad when no grounds have been judicially passed as to why my United Kingdom Citizenship/Nationality has been brought into question with the restriction on me as attached: ToLuluccTideWixCompaniesHouseSupremeCourtECHR2Dec2021.docx.
I should respectfully submit that when I first petitioned Her Majesty in 2000 after reading the Readers Digest Book 'You and your rights' that as a last resort a person can ,petition the Monarch, I had expected as all reasonable ,people would to have her personal judgment on whether I am welcome in the United Kingdom or not with the history of truth-seeking that I have engaged in to determine the Constitution of the United Kingdom, and creating the appropriate ,political structure in the construction of the The Conservative Libertarian Society with its offshoot The Conservative Libertarian Party of the United Kingdom( https://theconservativelibertariansociety.com; https://theconservativelibertarianpartyoftheunitedkingdom.com, to, try and resolve the anomalies in the Constitution that generates a lack of social and political cohesion in the State. But the petition got sent to Her Majesty's Court and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) and that went around in circles despite a subsequent reminder that I had sent earlier this year. So the Judgment on the petition has not been announced.
If you agree that this lack of Judgment from the petition to Her Majesty should receive a final judgment through a Judicial Review, kindly forward your response to this email through the Supreme Court enroute the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council to Her Majesty the Queen on the grounds that if the Monarch should have any direct role in the organisation and functions of the State it would be in the judicial processes to ensure that the population have access to the law to air their personal grievances that the criminal and civil laws have failed them on. On that score the The Conservative Libertarian Socierty views the Queens Speech to the House of Commons as being a figure-head role determined by the due processes of democracy,
Please let me know today whether I need to pay any additional fees to the £100 already paid to the HMCTS for this Judicial Review.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent
ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 09:58, Administrative Court Office, General Office <generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Dr Panigrahi
Would you like to lodge a judicial review? You can only do this in the court where the defendant is a public body or governing body. Who is the governing body in this instance?
Kind regards
Brian O’Meara *OFFICIAL*
Administrative Court Office | Issues and Enquiries | C324
Queen's Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| Strand, London | WC2A 2LL
T: 020 7947 6655 (Option 6)| Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts
cid:image002.jpg@01D42B18.AF6A0F40
Daily Cause List: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/court-lists/list-rcj
Listing Enquiries: listoffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
General Enquiries: generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
Criminal & Extradition Enquiries: crimex@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
Skeleton Arguments: london.skeletonarguments@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter
In accordance with Practice Direction 5B - Electronic communication and filing we ask you to do the following when sending an e-mail message to the court:
· Clearly state the Court's action number, parties’ names and any dates relating to an up-coming hearing in the subject header.
· In accordance with Practice Direction 3.3a, please do not submit documents which carry a payable fee; such e-mails will be deleted.
We do not accept documents over 50 pages by electronic means.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND EMAILS TO PERSONAL INBOXES AS NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. PERSONAL INBOXES ARE NOT MONITORED. PLEASE SEND ALL EMAILS TO:
generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
From: Shantanu Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 December 2021 15:45
To: Administrative Court Office, General Office <generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
Cc: Administrative Court Office, List Office <listoffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
Subject:
To
Administrative Court
Administrative Court Office
The Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London
WC2A 2LL
Dear Judge
May I entreat upon you to institute a Judicial Review that is long overdue on the attached conundrum: ToKatrinaSale(Conservatives)2Dec2021.
Thanking you in advance.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
===========
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and are intended for the use of the correct recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the author immediately. It is an offence to disclose or distribute the contents of this email and/or any attachments without consent of the author.
If your email has not been acknowledged or answered within 5 working days, or if you have difficulty reading this email or any attachment included, please contact the author on the number quoted above.
The author is not authorised to bind the Department contractually, or to make representations or other statements which may bind the Department in any way via electronic means.
===========
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
Attachments area
ToLuluccTideWixCompaniesHouseSupremeCourtECHR2Dec2021.docx
Comments