top of page
Search

May I detain the dishonest arsehole Judge Barry LIGHTMAN? Advise.

Writer's picture: shanpanigrahi3000shanpanigrahi3000

May I detain the dishonest arsehole Judge Barry LIGHTMAN? Advise.

Inbox

from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> via dizum.com

to: kim.brooks@fosters-law.co.uk,

shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com

date: 30 Oct 2021, 02:56

subject: May I detain the dishonest arsehole Judge Barry LIGHTMAN? Advise.

mailed-by: dizum.com

security: dizum.com did not encrypt this message Learn more


Be careful with this message

This may be a spoofed message. The message claims to have been sent from your account, but Gmail couldn’t verify the actual source. Avoid clicking links or replying with sensitive information, unless you are sure that you actually sent this message. (No need to reset your password, the real sender does not actually have access to your account!)


To FOSTERS

In the matter of my proceedings against PM Boris Johnson, former PM Theresa May and 1,788 Other Defendants, namely Case E35YM660 linked to the High Court case HQ17X01773 and other cases ME010463, 2018/PI/11721, A20170027, 46TY0039517, ME002953, CC/2002/PTA/0408, CO/1680/2002, CRD-2103-W1728YGQ, EK-210002255911, CM-FRLGN-08-18-56559, ET2302960/2014C, ET231144629800, UKEATPA/0461/1DM, ET1101675/2008, etc.

I need some urgent advice on my plan to arrest, detain and aggressively question a very deficient Judge who I suspect took a backhander from the Government Legal Department and as a result my appeal was refused by him on dubious and spurious grounds.

On the subject of what passes for justice in Britain, perhaps we should look for one who instantly reminds of 'light'?

Like as man called Light Man. We visit the Central London County Court and meet Barry Light man, which was my misfortune.

Lightman is not only light in name and complexion, and lightweight in abilities. It goes much further than just that.

Lightman is also very light in matters to do with constitutional rights. In fact Barry the Midget is quite dim. No, very dim.

So dim, in fact, that he goes out of his way to make the point that he is dim. And he is brazen about it.

Like standing in the way of certain parties in litigation to whom he takes a dislike. Parties, like me.

The dislike may be because this behnchod judge could get his evil way with one of the attractive juniors who may unwittingly hover around.

Barry, who is by no means a tall or significant figure, places himself in the way, barring the dignified and free exit from the court building of the party concerned. And Barry goes out of the court building. And follows parties in the street to discourse with them. Way into the street. He walks in the direction of where Oxford Street is. Or in the opposite way, heading for where Baker Street is. Barry usually swings both ways.

Barry Lightman is a very light man. And in his own, light, ways, he is effectively smashing those bits of civil law 'system', racket more like,

that the government often boasts about. When it comes to due process, Judge Barry Lightman recognises........ none.

Not if those are being claimed by person or persons that Barry thinks are of a lower level of humanity than himself. Such as immigrants with a browner skin than Mr Light Man, who prides himself that he is a light-skinned man.

Most parties in litigation at the Central London County Court who end up being 'managed' by District Judge Barry Lightman would fit that bill. And most of them are routinely kept down by Barry Lightman. Rare exceptions do occur. Just so that Barry can carry on.....

Barry does carry on also in the certain knowledge that he is unlikely ever to be confronted by any of the famous barristers. No Michael Mansfield is likely to appear before Barry Lightman advocating the rights of any of Barry’s victims. Most of those victims are beyond representation. They are litigants in person, and so harassed that they have lost all relevance to high-earning barristers like Mr Mansfield. And Barry Lightweight knows this only too well, so there is no one to call him out on his ridiculous pronouncements and errors in fact and law.

And so Barry is doing what some politicians would love to do. In a corner of central London still within walking distance from Trafalgar Square where huge crowds had been gathered, decades ago, to hear Nelson Mandela deliver one of his many grateful tributes to the British people for their help in the struggle against apartheid, Barry Lightman is maintaining apartheid. Correction. Barry Lightman is recreating apartheid in a court that is frequently approached by people desperate for justice.

People like me, to whose skin colour Barry Lightskin objects.

I feel I have no alternatives now but to secrete myself outside the Central London County Court for this corrupt Light Weight to appear, confront him with some facts relating to his terrible decision and flawed order of 21 June 2021 in Case E35YM660, and, depending on how unsatisfactory are his responses, take him into protective custody for questioning, at my leisure, at Shanti Niwas. I believe I can do so under current terrorist legislation for a period of up to twenty-eight days before habeas corpus means he must be delivered up before a magistrate.

I wonder if there are any drawbacks to this proposed course of action? Without more information, I cannot get the charges of misfeasance and malfeasance in judicial office to stick. I decided not to inform my wife because she is becoming increasingly nervous about my plans, ever since I told her how I ejaculated into the coffee I served to the young WPC who came

to my house uninvited to terrorise me.

I put all the background material for you in a reference link here https://archive.org/details/@panigrahi491

Will you please advise me without delay, by email or phone, about the wisdom of my proposed action against this rogue judge? If I need to pay for this preliminary advice, please notify me and I will do so, I have recently won one million pounds compensation for a 24 year malicious campaign of harassment against me by the British State.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

...

[Message clipped] View entire message

__________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Appeals - Registry postmaster: email received - DO NOT REPLY

Inbox

from: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 30 Oct 2021, 02:40

subject: Civil Appeals - Registry postmaster: email received - DO NOT REPLY

mailed-by: justice.gov.uk

Signed by: justice.gov.uk

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important according to Google magic.

With immediate effect:

URGENT APPLICATIONS

Urgent applications should be submitted to the court via email to this address: civilappeals.urgentwork@justice.gov.uk between 9am and 4.15 pm

What may be deemed as urgent:

Cases where in the interests of justice a substantive decision is required within 7 days. The types of work listed below fall into this category

Child cases;

Committal appeals;

Applications for stay of removal;

Evictions;

Cases (including ancillary applications) with a hearing listed in the Court of Appeal within the next month;

Applications for an urgent stay of execution;

Covid-19 related cases e.g. medical guidance regarding priority patients;

This auto response is confirmation that your email has been received. Staff will follow the internal processes that have been established to process your application as quickly as possible.

NON URGENT APPLICATIONS

Non-urgent applications should be emailed to: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk

This auto response is confirmation that your email has been received and you will not receive a separate acknowledgement. Your application will be dealt with as the court increases its capacity to manage new non urgent work.

ALL APPLICATIONS

All appellant’s notices will be accepted in the first instance on the basis that they may be rejected at a later date for want of jurisdiction.

Fresh applications for permission to appeal must include:

a completed appellant’s notice (form N161);

grounds of appeal on a separate sheet;

an undertaking to pay the appropriate court fee via your PBA account, a completed Help with Fees form (EX160) or by contacting the *RCJ Fees Office (see attached);

a copy of the sealed order being appealed; and

A transcript of judgment should also be provided if available (or should be ordered immediately).

Once an appellant’s notice has been filed, the Practice Direction 52C which supplements Part 52 of the Civil Procedure Rules, sets out time limits for filing further documents, including a core bundle with skeleton argument within 14 days. Time runs from the date of filing and not the date the sealed appellant’s notice is received from the court.

The public counter at E307 (Registry) remains closed, however a drop box facility is available at the main entrance into the Royal Courts of Justice.

Once the appellant’s notice is issued, all queries should continue to be emailed to the following addresses:

Civilappeals.cmsa@justice.gov.uk

Civilappeals.cmsb@justice.gov.uk

Civilappeals.cmsc@justice.gov.uk

Civilappeals.listing@justice.gov.uk

Civilappeals.associates@justice.gov.uk

As our IT capacity for remote working increases we will look to provide a limited telephone service to our users.

The court will issue orders electronically for the time being.

For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter

Customer feedback

The Court of Appeal – Civil Division accepts online complaints through the HMCTS online complaint form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/complaints-procedure

The online customer feedback system has been designed to help customers make an administrative complaint through the HM Courts & Tribunals Service process. It will also help us to learn from customer feedback to feed into possible improvements to the way we work.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an automated Delivery Response. Please do NOT reply to this email, it will NOT be viewed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / Blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

...[Message clipped] View entire message

Attachments area

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

07967789619

©2020 by The Conservative Libertarian Society. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page