FW: Confusing error in Master's Directions 2018/PI/11721
Inbox
Civil Appeals - Registry
Attachments17:23 (54 minutes ago)
Good afternoon, Please find the email requested as attached. Regards Mrs Sharon Walker - Delivery Manager - Civil Appeals Registry & In Court Support | Rm. E311
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>
date: 15 Nov 2021, 18:17
subject: Re: FW: Confusing error in Master's Directions 2018/PI/11721
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
Civll Appeals Registry
Thank you for confirmation of the email sent to you pretentiously on my behalf by someone that Kent Police has already been informed about because it is the recirculation of the same email that went to the Samaritans and others such as Gurpal Singh Tiwana and Wai Leung Solicitors. I had nothing to do with the original drafting of the email as I am very conscious that one can only phrase one's disappointments on a judgement or order as well as to an Appeal to that order by simply saying that District Judge Lightman 'has erred in law’ in the ways that I have outlined to the Central London County Court and leave the matter at that to keep expenditure of time and costs down. Kent Police have not been successful in identifying the sender of the original 2.40 am 30 October email in its earlier forms and the 25 criminal anonymous emails sent to the Conservative and Unionist Party that I was interrogated on despite my protestations. On the brighter side Kent Police have said to me in writing that I have acted correctly in legal terms and entirely lawfully in my activities as the President of the Conservative Libertarian Society and it’s The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited publications that number 21 Sections of the Book 'The Allurement of Reality' The loss of £55,000 and a further £4170 pounds is now lost forever but these may be tax deductible when I fill in my tax returns to HMRC and submit the report to Companies House next Spring for East Kent Magistrates Court has not restored the arrest summons on the Chief Constable of Kent Police to endorse the United Kingdom State's offer to seemingly let me to progress those proceedings with him as the State's chosen fall guy.
I am therefore not going to waste police time by getting Kent Police to investigate afresh the 1500 criminal anonymous emails since I started E35YM660 in September 2017 that my wife, I, and my friends and associates such as Sainsburys plc, Tesco, Dr Odesanya, and Funke Aderibole have received for I put it all down to the times that we live in in the internet era when criminals can use the hijacking of email accounts such as my shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk and Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com account to manipulate the due process of civil and criminal proceedings from untraceable accounts. Fortunately I had saved all these emails and associated material in the internet for you to look at in your spare time: here they are.
Wordpress has also said that the https://shantanup.wordpress.com and https://towardsknowledgeforworldconservation.com Blogs cannot be restored and ICANN have not taken any action against Wordpress. So be it. I am not bothered for the Bhagavad Gita, my father said always to me, should be read repetitively as Tyaag,Tyaag,Tyaag,(Give up/Sacrifice) and never to look for the outcome of ones actions in life but live in surrender to the Divine Consciousness through Vishnu that I do as a Vishista-advaitist.
Have I missed anything? something?
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 17:23, Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk> wrote:
Good afternoon,
Please find the email requested as attached.
Regards
HM Courts & Tribunals Service logo
Mrs Sharon Walker - Delivery Manager - Civil Appeals
Registry & In Court Support | Rm. E311
Royal Courts of Justice|Strand|London|WC2A 2LL|DX 44456 Strand
gov.uk/hmcts
Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparation
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
PERMA model of positive wellbeing: Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning & Accomplishments
From: Shantanu Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 November 2021 13:36
To: Civil Appeals - Registry
Cc: Central London DJSKEL; registry@supremecourt.uk
Subject: Confusing error in Master's Directions
Dear Sirs
Please refer to the attached correspondence from the Master at the Court of Appeal FrCivilAppealsREgistry(CourtofAppeal)3Nov2021, concerning the attached Appellants Notice for which I have paid £100 Court Fee as long back as in the 4th week of June 2021 to the Central London County Court in relation to the n161-eng-1CourtofAppeal.pdf also attached.
This official Appellant's Form that was brought to the attention of the Civil Appeal's Registry for the Court of Appeals consideration because no action was taken by the Circuit Judge at the Central London County Court on it before or since its submission was seeking
Directions on what the next course of action should be for me as the Appellant, if not at the Court of Appeal.
Instead, the Civil Appeals Registry has drawn my attention to the Master's Ruling at the Court of Appeal as follows:
''I further refer to your email of 30th October 2021 (sent at 02.41). The email does not seek assistance with procedure or practice in the Court of Appeal and does not relate to any proposed application to this Court. It is abusive and threatening in nature. The Civil Appeals Office will not be responding to that email. Any further emails of this nature will receive neither reply nor acknowledgement."
I strongly deny having sent any such email to the Civil Appeals Registry for the Master's consideration and so would therefore be grateful if you would kindly forward to me a copy of this email so that the individual Victims of Panigrahi Association (VOPA) can be identified by Kent Police to enable me file an Appeal against the Master's Directions with the Senior Master at the Court of Appeal or at the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom as the procedures allow me to pursue.
Thank you for an immediate reply
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / Blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Attachments area:
Subject: May I detain the dishonest arsehole Judge Barry LIGHTMAN? Advise.
Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
Sat, 30 Oct, 02:40
to Ccmcc Customer Enquiries, Civil Appeals - Registry, HMCTS Customer Service (Correspondence), QB Issue & Enquiries, Nadia.Hussain@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
You are viewing an attached message.
Gmail can't verify the authenticity of attached messages.
Dear HMCTS
I need some urgent advice on my plan to arrest, detain and aggressively question a very deficient Judge who I suspect took a backhander from the Government Legal Department.
On the subject of what passes for justice in Britain, perhaps we should look for one who instantly reminds of 'light'?
Like as man called Light Man. We visit the Central London County Court and meet Barry Light man.
Lightman is not only light in name and complexion, and lightweight in abilities. It goes much further than just that.
Lightman is also very light in matters to do with constitutional rights. In fact Barry the Midget is quite dim. No, very dim.
So dim, in fact, that he goes out of his way to make the point that he is dim. And he is brazen about it.
Like standing in the way of certain parties in litigation to whom he takes a dislike.
Parties like me.
The dislike may be because he could get his evil way with one of the attractive juniors who hover around.
Barry, who is by no means a tall or significant figure, places himself in the way, barring the dignified and free exit from the court building of the party concerned. And Barry goes out of the court building. And follows parties in the street to discourse with them. Way into the street. He walks in the direction of where Oxford Street is. Or in the opposite way, heading for where Baker Street is. Barry usually swings both ways.
Barry Lightman is a very light man. And in his own, light, ways, he is effectively smashing those bits of civil law 'system', racket more like,
that the government often boasts about. When it comes to due process, Judge Barry Lightman recognises........ none.
Not if those are being claimed by person or persons that Barry thinks are of a lower level of humanity than himself. Such as immigrants with a browner skin than Mr Light Man, who prides himself that he is a light-skinned man.
Most parties in litigation at the Central London County Court who end up being 'managed' by District Judge Barry Lightman would fit that bill. And most of them are routinely kept down by Barry Lightman. Rare exceptions do occur. Just so that Barry can carry on.....
Barry does carry on also in the certain knowledge that he is unlikely ever to be confronted by any of the famous barristers. No Michael Mansfield is likely to appear before Barry Lightman advocating the rights of any of Barry’s victims. Most of those victims are beyond representation. They are litigants in person, and so harassed that they have lost all relevance to high-earning barristers like Mr Mansfield. And Barry Lightweight knows this only too well, so there is no one to call him out on his ridiculous pronouncements and errors in fact and law.
And so Barry is doing what some politicians would love to do. In a corner of central London still within walking distance from Trafalgar Square where huge crowds had been gathered, decades ago, to hear Nelson Mandela deliver one of his many grateful tributes to the British people for their help in the struggle against apartheid, Barry Lightman is maintaining apartheid. Correction. Barry Lightman is recreating apartheid in a court that is frequently approached by people desperate for justice.
People like me, to whose skin colour Barry Lightskin objects.
I feel I have no alternatives now but to secrete myself outside the Central London County Court for this corrupt Light Weight to appear, confront him with some facts relating to his terrible decision and flawed order of 21 June 2021 in Case E35YM660, and, depending on how unsatisfactory are his responses, take him into protective custody for questioning, at my leisure, at Shanti Niwas. I believe I can do so under current terrorist legislation for a period of up to twenty-eight days before habeas corpus means he must
be delivered up before a magistrate.
I wonder if there are any drawbacks to this proposed course of action? I decided not to inform my wife because she is becoming increasingly nervous about my plans, ever since I told her how I ejaculated into the coffee I served to the young WPC who came to my house uninvited to terrorise me.
I put all the background material for you in a reference link here https://archive.org/details/@panigrahi491
Will you please advise me without delay, by email or phone, about the wisdom of my proposed action against this rogue judge? If I need to pay for this preliminary advice, please notify me and I will do so, I have recently won one million pounds compensation for a 24 year campaign of harassment against me by the British State.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
Comments