Ed Mulhouse and the research on HHJ N. Parfitt's failure to recuse2
Yahoo/Sent
Thu, 18 Nov at 19:15
Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
To:Forz Khan
Thu, 18 Nov at 20:24
Dear Mr Khan
This is true is it not? Further, were you put under some pressure from other sources not to undertake the private prosecution of the Chief Constable of Kent Police at Maidstone Crown Court on Appeal from the decision of the East Kent Magistrate's Court?
I should remind you that you had sent me contractual-documents that were signed by me and returned to you so it was a binding contract with yourself that has to be fulfilled now belatedly, as set out by ~~~Cherie below.
I am sorry if I gave the impression that Muslims were dim-witted enough to read the Quran and abide with all its formal instructions here in the United Kingdom, but did religion in me not being a Muslim form a part of your considerations that you did not act for me previously?
Kindly confirm if I have legal grounds to submit the N244 Form relating to HHJ Parfitt's failure to recuse, for that is the Order that needs to be appealed not the Order of District Judge Lightman the latter being a costs order as a consequence of HHJ Parfitt's earlier Order attached: CentralLondonCountyCourtJudgementorOrder19January 2021_22March2021.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
----- Forwarded message -----
From: Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>
To: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>; "centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk" <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>; "shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com" <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>; "tiwana9rf@btinternet.com" <tiwana9rf@btinternet.com>; "civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk" <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>
Sent: Thursday, 18 November 2021, 19:15:35 GMT
Subject: Ed Mulhouse and the research on HHJ N. Parfitt's failure to recuse
Dear Shan,
Re: E35YM660
Why have you not acted on this-
HHJ Parfitt's prior involvement, however limited or tenuous, with Forz Khan in
his capacity of litigant (not counsel), your lawyer at the time Nick heard
E35YM660, as documented in is adequate to require him, in accordance with the
Civils Procedure Rules (CPR) to recuse himself from your case. If in error or
ignorance of the facts he did not do so, his ruling itself is voidable upon
application.
Parfitt seems to like giving unentitled women 30 grand diamonds. An
astoundingly unjust judgment from 2018. He isn't very bright, as dim as
Lightman, and will reverse his decision on suitable application of judicial
conduct pressure. I eat judges like him alive every other week.
Keep the N244 succinct. Do not bring in vishishta advaita or other irrelevant
nonsense. For once, win. Be fast. You'll be out of time in about six weeks.
Further -- stop threatending to behead HMQ and wasting police time and
insulting Muslims and harassing women. It isn't funny.
Who is the person answering 07825521586?
~~~Cherie
Per your directions, I am copying this email to Mr. Tiwana and to Room 311.
CentralLondonCountyCourtJudgementorOrder19 January2021_22March2021.docx
14.2kB
Comments