top of page
Search

Ed Mulhouse and the research on HHJ N. Parfitt's failure to recuse2

Writer's picture: shanpanigrahi3000shanpanigrahi3000

Ed Mulhouse and the research on HHJ N. Parfitt's failure to recuse2

Yahoo/Sent

Thu, 18 Nov at 19:15

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:Forz Khan

Thu, 18 Nov at 20:24


Dear Mr Khan


This is true is it not? Further, were you put under some pressure from other sources not to undertake the private prosecution of the Chief Constable of Kent Police at Maidstone Crown Court on Appeal from the decision of the East Kent Magistrate's Court?


I should remind you that you had sent me contractual-documents that were signed by me and returned to you so it was a binding contract with yourself that has to be fulfilled now belatedly, as set out by ~~~Cherie below.


I am sorry if I gave the impression that Muslims were dim-witted enough to read the Quran and abide with all its formal instructions here in the United Kingdom, but did religion in me not being a Muslim form a part of your considerations that you did not act for me previously?


Kindly confirm if I have legal grounds to submit the N244 Form relating to HHJ Parfitt's failure to recuse, for that is the Order that needs to be appealed not the Order of District Judge Lightman the latter being a costs order as a consequence of HHJ Parfitt's earlier Order attached: CentralLondonCountyCourtJudgementorOrder19January 2021_22March2021.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


----- Forwarded message -----

From: Anonymous Remailer (austria) <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>

To: "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>; "centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk" <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>; "shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com" <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>; "tiwana9rf@btinternet.com" <tiwana9rf@btinternet.com>; "civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk" <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

Sent: Thursday, 18 November 2021, 19:15:35 GMT

Subject: Ed Mulhouse and the research on HHJ N. Parfitt's failure to recuse


Dear Shan,

Re: E35YM660

Why have you not acted on this-


HHJ Parfitt's prior involvement, however limited or tenuous, with Forz Khan in

his capacity of litigant (not counsel), your lawyer at the time Nick heard

E35YM660, as documented in is adequate to require him, in accordance with the

Civils Procedure Rules (CPR) to recuse himself from your case. If in error or

ignorance of the facts he did not do so, his ruling itself is voidable upon

application.


Parfitt seems to like giving unentitled women 30 grand diamonds. An

astoundingly unjust judgment from 2018. He isn't very bright, as dim as

Lightman, and will reverse his decision on suitable application of judicial

conduct pressure. I eat judges like him alive every other week.


Keep the N244 succinct. Do not bring in vishishta advaita or other irrelevant

nonsense. For once, win. Be fast. You'll be out of time in about six weeks.


Further -- stop threatending to behead HMQ and wasting police time and

insulting Muslims and harassing women. It isn't funny.


Who is the person answering 07825521586?


~~~Cherie


Per your directions, I am copying this email to Mr. Tiwana and to Room 311.


CentralLondonCountyCourtJudgementorOrder19 January2021_22March2021.docx

14.2kB




0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

07967789619

©2020 by The Conservative Libertarian Society. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page